Comparison
Kamut farfalline n°28 vs Pasta turanicum
Overall, Kamut farfalline n°28 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kamut farfalline n°28 | Pasta turanicum |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 358 kcal | 336 kcal |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 1.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 3 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kamut farfalline n°28 has 21% more protein (14 g vs 11 g).
Ingredients
Kamut farfalline n°28
Not available.
Pasta turanicum
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kamut farfalline n°28 or Pasta turanicum?
Overall, Kamut farfalline n°28 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pasta turanicum has fewer calories: 336 kcal versus 358 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kamut farfalline n°28 has less sugar: 2 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Fusillon khoradan vs Pasta turanicum
Khorasan kamut spaghetti vs Pasta turanicum
Spaghetti di kamut vs Pasta turanicum
Fusillon khoradan vs Kamut farfalline n°28
Kamut farfalline n°28 vs Khorasan kamut spaghetti
Spaghetti di kamut vs Kamut farfalline n°28
Pasta de trigo kamut eco... vs Pasta turanicum
Kamut farfalline n°28 vs Pasta de trigo kamut eco...