Spaghetti di kamut vs Pasta turanicum
Overall, Spaghetti di kamut has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Spaghetti di kamut | Pasta turanicum |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 349 kcal | 336 kcal |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 1.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 4.4 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4.6 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pasta turanicum has 50% less sugar (2.2 g vs 4.4 g).
- Spaghetti di kamut has 35% more fiber (4.6 g vs 3 g).
- Spaghetti di kamut has 21% more protein (14 g vs 11 g).
Ingredients
Spaghetti di kamut
Not available.
Pasta turanicum
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Spaghetti di kamut or Pasta turanicum?
Overall, Spaghetti di kamut has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pasta turanicum has fewer calories: 336 kcal versus 349 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pasta turanicum has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 4.4 g per 100 g.