Comparison

Fusillon khoradan vs Pasta turanicum

Overall, Fusillon khoradan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Better choice
Fusillon khoradan

Fusillon khoradan

Lima · 500 g
a NOVA 1
Pasta turanicum

Pasta turanicum

Naturasì
a

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFusillon khoradanPasta turanicum
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 343 kcal 336 kcal
Fat 1.9 g 1.9 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.4 g
Sugars 4.2 g 2.2 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 6.6 g 3 g
Protein 13 g 11 g
Additives00
AllergensBlé Khorasan*None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pasta turanicum has 48% less sugar (2.2 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Fusillon khoradan has 55% more fiber (6.6 g vs 3 g).
  • Fusillon khoradan has 15% more protein (13 g vs 11 g).
  • Only Fusillon khoradan lists: Blé Khorasan*.

Ingredients

Fusillon khoradan

Semoule complète de _blé Khorasan*_, eau. *issus de l'agriculture biologique.

Pasta turanicum

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fusillon khoradan or Pasta turanicum?

Overall, Fusillon khoradan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pasta turanicum has fewer calories: 336 kcal versus 343 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pasta turanicum has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 4.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Kamut farfalline n°28 vs Pasta turanicum Khorasan kamut spaghetti vs Pasta turanicum Spaghetti di kamut vs Pasta turanicum Fusillon khoradan vs Kamut farfalline n°28 Fusillon khoradan vs Fusilli turanicum Fusillon khoradan vs Khorasan kamut spaghetti Fusillon khoradan vs Spaghetti di kamut Pasta de trigo kamut eco... vs Pasta turanicum