Fusillon khoradan vs Kamut farfalline n°28
Overall, Kamut farfalline n°28 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fusillon khoradan | Kamut farfalline n°28 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 343 kcal | 358 kcal |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 1.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 4.2 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 6.6 g | — |
| Protein | 13 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Blé Khorasan* | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kamut farfalline n°28 has 52% less sugar (2 g vs 4.2 g).
- Only Fusillon khoradan lists: Blé Khorasan*.
Ingredients
Fusillon khoradan
Semoule complète de _blé Khorasan*_, eau. *issus de l'agriculture biologique.
Kamut farfalline n°28
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fusillon khoradan or Kamut farfalline n°28?
Overall, Kamut farfalline n°28 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fusillon khoradan has fewer calories: 343 kcal versus 358 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kamut farfalline n°28 has less sugar: 2 g versus 4.2 g per 100 g.