Comparison

Fusillon khoradan vs Kamut farfalline n°28

Overall, Kamut farfalline n°28 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFusillon khoradanKamut farfalline n°28
Nutri-Score a —
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 343 kcal 358 kcal
Fat 1.9 g 1.7 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.4 g
Sugars 4.2 g 2 g
Salt 0 g —
Fiber 6.6 g —
Protein 13 g 14 g
Additives00
AllergensBlé Khorasan*None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kamut farfalline n°28 has 52% less sugar (2 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Only Fusillon khoradan lists: Blé Khorasan*.

Ingredients

Fusillon khoradan

Semoule complète de _blé Khorasan*_, eau. *issus de l'agriculture biologique.

Kamut farfalline n°28

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fusillon khoradan or Kamut farfalline n°28?

Overall, Kamut farfalline n°28 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fusillon khoradan has fewer calories: 343 kcal versus 358 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kamut farfalline n°28 has less sugar: 2 g versus 4.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons