Comparison
Kamut farfalline n°28 vs Pasta de trigo kamut ecológico
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kamut farfalline n°28 | Pasta de trigo kamut ecológi... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 358 kcal | 351 kcal |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pasta de trigo kamut ecológico has 41% less fat (1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Kamut farfalline n°28 has 44% less sugar (2 g vs 3.6 g).
Ingredients
Kamut farfalline n°28
Not available.
Pasta de trigo kamut ecológico
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kamut farfalline n°28 or Pasta de trigo kamut ecológico?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pasta de trigo kamut ecológico has fewer calories: 351 kcal versus 358 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kamut farfalline n°28 has less sugar: 2 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Kamut farfalline n°28 vs Pasta turanicum
Fusillon khoradan vs Kamut farfalline n°28
Kamut farfalline n°28 vs Khorasan kamut spaghetti
Spaghetti di kamut vs Kamut farfalline n°28
Pasta di kamut vs Pasta de trigo kamut eco...
Pasta de trigo kamut eco... vs Fusilli turanicum
Pasta de trigo kamut eco... vs Pasta turanicum
Fusillon khoradan vs Pasta de trigo kamut eco...