Fusillon khoradan vs Pasta de trigo kamut ecológico
Overall, Pasta de trigo kamut ecológico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fusillon khoradan | Pasta de trigo kamut ecológi... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 343 kcal | 351 kcal |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 4.2 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.6 g | — |
| Protein | 13 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Blé Khorasan* | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pasta de trigo kamut ecológico has 47% less fat (1 g vs 1.9 g).
- Pasta de trigo kamut ecológico has 14% less sugar (3.6 g vs 4.2 g).
- Only Fusillon khoradan lists: Blé Khorasan*.
Ingredients
Fusillon khoradan
Semoule complète de _blé Khorasan*_, eau. *issus de l'agriculture biologique.
Pasta de trigo kamut ecológico
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fusillon khoradan or Pasta de trigo kamut ecológico?
Overall, Pasta de trigo kamut ecológico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fusillon khoradan has fewer calories: 343 kcal versus 351 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pasta de trigo kamut ecológico has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 4.2 g per 100 g.