Passata vs Sugo al Basilico
Overall, Passata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Passata | Sugo al Basilico |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 36 kcal | 67 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 4.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 5.7 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 1.7 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Celery |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Passata has 46% fewer calories (36 kcal vs 67 kcal).
- Passata has 89% less fat (0.5 g vs 4.4 g).
- Passata has no saturated fat, while Sugo al Basilico has 0.5 g.
- Sugo al Basilico has 12% less sugar (5 g vs 5.7 g).
- Passata has 50% less salt (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Passata has 53% more fiber (1.7 g vs 0.8 g).
- Passata has 35% more protein (1.7 g vs 1.1 g).
- Sugo al Basilico has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Sugo al Basilico lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Passata
51% loupaná krájená rajčata, 47% pasírovaná rajčata, 0,6% bazalka, cukr, jedlá sůl, cibule, regulátor kyselosti: kyselina citronová.
Sugo al Basilico
Purée de tomates 83,10%, légumes en quantités variables (carottes, oignons, céleri), huile de tournesol, basilic Genovese AOP 2%, sucre, sel, jus de citron concentré.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Passata or Sugo al Basilico?
Overall, Passata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Passata has fewer calories: 36 kcal versus 67 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sugo al Basilico has less sugar: 5 g versus 5.7 g per 100 g.