Passata vs Mutti Pastasaus met basilicum
Overall, Passata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Passata | Mutti Pastasaus met basilicu... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 36 kcal | 56 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 2.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 5.7 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 1.7 g | 1.6 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Celery |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Passata has 36% fewer calories (36 kcal vs 56 kcal).
- Passata has 82% less fat (0.5 g vs 2.8 g).
- Passata has no saturated fat, while Mutti Pastasaus met basilicum has 0.5 g.
- Mutti Pastasaus met basilicum has 21% less sugar (4.5 g vs 5.7 g).
- Passata has 38% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Mutti Pastasaus met basilicum has the better Nutri-Score.
- Passata is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Mutti Pastasaus met basilicum lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Passata
51% loupaná krájená rajčata, 47% pasírovaná rajčata, 0,6% bazalka, cukr, jedlá sůl, cibule, regulátor kyselosti: kyselina citronová.
Mutti Pastasaus met basilicum
Gehackte Tomaten 60 %, passierte Tomaten 21%, Tomatenmark 10,2%, Olivenöl, Zwiebeln, Basilikum 1,5%, Karotten, natürliche Aromen, Salz
FAQ
Which is healthier: Passata or Mutti Pastasaus met basilicum?
Overall, Passata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Passata has fewer calories: 36 kcal versus 56 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mutti Pastasaus met basilicum has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 5.7 g per 100 g.