Parmentier de saumon vs Parmentier de saumon et cabillaud
Overall, Parmentier de saumon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Parmentier de saumon | Parmentier de saumon et cabi... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 102 kcal | 139 kcal |
| Fat | 7.5 g | 7.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 3.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 5.9 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery, Eggs, Fish, Gluten, Lupin, Milk, Mustard, Sesame seeds | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Parmentier de saumon has 27% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 139 kcal).
- Parmentier de saumon has 27% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 3.3 g).
- Parmentier de saumon has 32% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2.2 g).
- Parmentier de saumon et cabillaud has 16% more protein (7 g vs 5.9 g).
- Only Parmentier de saumon lists: Celery, Eggs, Fish, Gluten, Lupin, Milk, Mustard, Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Parmentier de saumon
Purée de pommes de terre 51% (pommes de terre 35%, LAIT, CREME, eau, BEURRE sel), SAUMON Atlantique et/ou SAUMON kéta 18%, poireau, Crème (LAIT), cignon, OEUF farine de BLE (GLUTEN), jus de citron, ail, sel, poivre. Traces possibles de crustacé, mollusque. ceuf, soja, fruits à coque, céleri, moutarde, sésame, lupin
Parmentier de saumon et cabillaud
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Parmentier de saumon or Parmentier de saumon et cabillaud?
Overall, Parmentier de saumon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Parmentier de saumon has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 139 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Parmentier de saumon has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.