Parelkandij vs Mini zero% ontbijtkoek
Overall, Mini zero% ontbijtkoek has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Parelkandij | Mini zero% ontbijtkoek |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 313 kcal | 208 kcal |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 40 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | — |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mini zero% ontbijtkoek has 34% fewer calories (208 kcal vs 313 kcal).
- Mini zero% ontbijtkoek has 55% less fat (1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Mini zero% ontbijtkoek has 94% less sugar (2.5 g vs 40 g).
- Parelkandij has 39% more protein (3.3 g vs 2 g).
- Only Parelkandij lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Parelkandij
Glucose-fructosestroop, _rogge_bloem (36%), water, parelsuiker (8%), suiker, rijsmiddelen (natriumwaterstofcarbonaat, dinatriumdifosfaat), kaneel, zonnebloemolie, tarwezetmeel, specerijen.
Mini zero% ontbijtkoek
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Parelkandij or Mini zero% ontbijtkoek?
Overall, Mini zero% ontbijtkoek has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mini zero% ontbijtkoek has fewer calories: 208 kcal versus 313 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mini zero% ontbijtkoek has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 40 g per 100 g.