Panna cotta vs Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne
Overall, Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Panna cotta | Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahn... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 194 kcal | 126 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 6.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.5 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 14 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 2.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has 35% fewer calories (126 kcal vs 194 kcal).
- Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has 56% less fat (6.1 g vs 14 g).
- Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has 58% less saturated fat (4 g vs 9.5 g).
- Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has 21% less sugar (11 g vs 14 g).
- Panna cotta has 21% more protein (3.4 g vs 2.7 g).
- Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Panna cotta
Crème entière¹ (46%) (lait), lait écrémé¹, sucre, gélatine, arôme naturel. ¹Lait origine France.
Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne
Vollmilch, 11 % Sahne, Zucker, modifizierte Stärke, Glukosesirup, Stärke, Verdickungsmittel Carrageen, Aroma, Vanillesamen (extrahiert), Speisesalz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Panna cotta or Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne?
Overall, Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has fewer calories: 126 kcal versus 194 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Panna Cotta Pudding mit Sahne has less sugar: 11 g versus 14 g per 100 g.