Comparison

Pan Cake vs Coni in cialda

Overall, Coni in cialda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPan CakeConi in cialda
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 355 kcal 404 kcal
Fat 15 g 3.6 g
Saturated fat 2.2 g 1.3 g
Sugars 19 g 4.8 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.3 g
Fiber 0.7 g —
Protein 5.7 g 7.7 g
Additives52
AllergensEggs, Gluten, MilkGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pan Cake has 12% fewer calories (355 kcal vs 404 kcal).
  • Coni in cialda has 76% less fat (3.6 g vs 15 g).
  • Coni in cialda has 41% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Coni in cialda has 75% less sugar (4.8 g vs 19 g).
  • Coni in cialda has 60% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Coni in cialda has 26% more protein (7.7 g vs 5.7 g).
  • Coni in cialda has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Pan Cake lists: Eggs, Milk.
  • Only Coni in cialda lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Pan Cake

Farina di grano tenero tipo "0", _uova_ fresche, zucchero, olio di semi di girasole, destrosio, acqua, latte intero fresco pastorizzato, emulsionanti: mono - e digliceridi degli acidi grassi; agenti lievitanti: difosfato disodico, carbonato acido di sodio; sale, aromi. Può contenere _senape_ e _soia_.

Coni in cialda

Farina di frumento, zucchero, amido di frumento, emulsionante: lecitina di soia; grasso vegetale: olio di cocco; sale, agente lievitante: carbonato acido di sodio; aroma vaniglia. Può contenere senape.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pan Cake or Coni in cialda?

Overall, Coni in cialda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pan Cake has fewer calories: 355 kcal versus 404 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Coni in cialda has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 19 g per 100 g.

More comparisons