Coni in cialda vs Plum-cake integrali
Overall, Coni in cialda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coni in cialda | Plum-cake integrali |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 404 kcal | 383 kcal |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 4.8 g | 27 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 4.2 g |
| Protein | 7.7 g | 6.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coni in cialda has 79% less fat (3.6 g vs 17 g).
- Coni in cialda has 35% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2 g).
- Coni in cialda has 82% less sugar (4.8 g vs 27 g).
- Coni in cialda has 74% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.2 g).
- Coni in cialda has 16% more protein (7.7 g vs 6.5 g).
- Coni in cialda has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Coni in cialda lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Coni in cialda
Farina di frumento, zucchero, amido di frumento, emulsionante: lecitina di soia; grasso vegetale: olio di cocco; sale, agente lievitante: carbonato acido di sodio; aroma vaniglia. Può contenere senape.
Plum-cake integrali
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coni in cialda or Plum-cake integrali?
Overall, Coni in cialda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Plum-cake integrali has fewer calories: 383 kcal versus 404 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coni in cialda has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 27 g per 100 g.