Comparison

Treccine di pasta sfoglia vs Coni in cialda

Overall, Coni in cialda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTreccine di pasta sfogliaConi in cialda
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 578 kcal 404 kcal
Fat 39 g 3.6 g
Saturated fat 18.9 g 1.3 g
Sugars 14 g 4.8 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.3 g
Fiber 4 g —
Protein 6.6 g 7.7 g
Additives12
AllergensGluten, SoybeansGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Coni in cialda has 30% fewer calories (404 kcal vs 578 kcal).
  • Coni in cialda has 91% less fat (3.6 g vs 39 g).
  • Coni in cialda has 93% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 18.9 g).
  • Coni in cialda has 66% less sugar (4.8 g vs 14 g).
  • Coni in cialda has 14% more protein (7.7 g vs 6.6 g).
  • Coni in cialda has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Treccine di pasta sfoglia

Farina di frumento, grasso vegetale non idrogenato (palma) e oli vegetali non idrogenati (soia, mais, girasole) in proporzione variabile, zucchero, farina di frumento maltato, sale, emulsionanti: mono e digliceridi degli acidi grassi (di origine vegetale), aromi. Può contenere soia, senape e lupini.

Coni in cialda

Farina di frumento, zucchero, amido di frumento, emulsionante: lecitina di soia; grasso vegetale: olio di cocco; sale, agente lievitante: carbonato acido di sodio; aroma vaniglia. Può contenere senape.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Treccine di pasta sfoglia or Coni in cialda?

Overall, Coni in cialda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Coni in cialda has fewer calories: 404 kcal versus 578 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Coni in cialda has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 14 g per 100 g.

More comparisons