Comparison

Pain d'épices Miel vs Pepperkaker

Overall, Pain d'épices Miel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPain d'épices MielPepperkaker
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 315 kcal 434 kcal
Fat 0.8 g 15.1 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 1.2 g
Sugars 38 g 31.9 g
Salt 0.6 g 1.5 g
Fiber 3.3 g 0 g
Protein 3.3 g 6.1 g
Additives21
AllergensGluten, NutsGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pain d'épices Miel has 27% fewer calories (315 kcal vs 434 kcal).
  • Pain d'épices Miel has 95% less fat (0.8 g vs 15.1 g).
  • Pain d'épices Miel has 92% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Pepperkaker has 16% less sugar (31.9 g vs 38 g).
  • Pain d'épices Miel has 61% less salt (0.6 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Pain d'épices Miel has 100% more fiber (3.3 g vs 0 g).
  • Pepperkaker has 46% more protein (6.1 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Pain d'épices Miel has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Pepperkaker is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Pain d'épices Miel lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Pain d'épices Miel

Farine de seigle, sirop de glucose - fructose, 20% miel, poudres à lever: carbonates de sodium, diphosphates; eau, 0,1% cannelle. Laces éventuelles de céréales contenant du gluten, de dalt d'amandes et de noix

Pepperkaker

hvetemel, sukker, sirup, vegetabilsk olje (raps), hevemiddel (E500), kanel, ingefær, salt, nellik og pepper. Kan inneholde spor av mandler og egg.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pain d'épices Miel or Pepperkaker?

Overall, Pain d'épices Miel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pain d'épices Miel has fewer calories: 315 kcal versus 434 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pepperkaker has less sugar: 31.9 g versus 38 g per 100 g.

More comparisons