Comparison

Otręby pszenne vs Riccioli di crusca

Overall, Otręby pszenne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOtręby pszenneRiccioli di crusca
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 183 kcal 315 kcal
Fat 4.8 g 3 g
Saturated fat 0.8 g 0.5 g
Sugars 2.3 g 1.7 g
Salt 0 g 1.1 g
Fiber 43.6 g —
Protein 16 g 15 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Otręby pszenne has 42% fewer calories (183 kcal vs 315 kcal).
  • Riccioli di crusca has 38% less fat (3 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Riccioli di crusca has 38% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Riccioli di crusca has 26% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Otręby pszenne has 98% less salt (0 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Otręby pszenne has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Otręby pszenne is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Otręby pszenne

otręby _pszenne. Produkt może zawierać _soję i _mleko.

Riccioli di crusca

RICCIOLI DI CRUSCA. PRODOTTO ESTRUSO. Ingredienti: crusca di GRANO TENERO 70%, farina di mais, sale marino. Può contenere SOIA, SESAMO, SENAPE e FRUTTA A GUSCIO.CONTIENE GLUTINE.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Otręby pszenne or Riccioli di crusca?

Overall, Otręby pszenne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Otręby pszenne has fewer calories: 183 kcal versus 315 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Riccioli di crusca has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons