Comparison
Otręby pszenne vs Otręby owsiane
Overall, Otręby pszenne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Otręby pszenne | Otręby owsiane |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 183 kcal | 425 kcal |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 2.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 43.6 g | 15 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Otręby pszenne has 57% fewer calories (183 kcal vs 425 kcal).
- Otręby pszenne has 31% less fat (4.8 g vs 7 g).
- Otręby pszenne has 38% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.3 g).
- Otręby owsiane has 35% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2.3 g).
- Otręby pszenne has 66% more fiber (43.6 g vs 15 g).
Ingredients
Otręby pszenne
otręby _pszenne. Produkt może zawierać _soję i _mleko.
Otręby owsiane
Otręby _owsiane_, Może zawierać soję oraz mleko,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Otręby pszenne or Otręby owsiane?
Overall, Otręby pszenne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Otręby pszenne has fewer calories: 183 kcal versus 425 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Otręby owsiane has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.