Comparison

Or, Xata! light vs Bebida de chufa sin lactosa

Overall, Bebida de chufa sin lactosa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOr, Xata! lightBebida de chufa sin lactosa
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 56 kcal 40 kcal
Fat 2.5 g 2.5 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0.7 g
Sugars 6.3 g 2.3 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber — 0.1 g
Protein 0.6 g 0.7 g
Additives54
AllergensMilkSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bebida de chufa sin lactosa has 29% fewer calories (40 kcal vs 56 kcal).
  • Bebida de chufa sin lactosa has 63% less sugar (2.3 g vs 6.3 g).
  • Bebida de chufa sin lactosa has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Or, Xata! light lists: Milk.
  • Only Bebida de chufa sin lactosa lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Or, Xata! light

Agua, chufas (14%), azúcar, edulcorante: sucralosa, emulgentes: E-472c y E-471, estabilizante: goma gellan, corrector de acidez: citratos de sodio, aromas naturales de canela y limón. LACTOSA <0,01g/100 ml de producto.

Bebida de chufa sin lactosa

Agua, chufas, emulgente: ésteres cítricos de mono y diglicéridos de ácidos grasos (E-472c), proteína de soja, estabilizador: carragenatos (E-407), edulcorantes: sucralosa (E-955) y acesulfame (E-950), aromas de limón y canela. (Nota del redactor: Se ha comprobado con el fabricante que el emulgente E-472c es de origen no animal).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Or, Xata! light or Bebida de chufa sin lactosa?

Overall, Bebida de chufa sin lactosa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bebida de chufa sin lactosa has fewer calories: 40 kcal versus 56 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bebida de chufa sin lactosa has less sugar: 2.3 g versus 6.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons