Or, Xata! light vs Bebida de chufa
Overall, Bebida de chufa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Or, Xata! light | Bebida de chufa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 56 kcal | 46 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 2.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 6.3 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 1 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 5 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bebida de chufa has 17% fewer calories (46 kcal vs 56 kcal).
- Bebida de chufa has 29% less sugar (4.5 g vs 6.3 g).
- Bebida de chufa has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Or, Xata! light lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Or, Xata! light
Agua, chufas (14%), azúcar, edulcorante: sucralosa, emulgentes: E-472c y E-471, estabilizante: goma gellan, corrector de acidez: citratos de sodio, aromas naturales de canela y limón. LACTOSA <0,01g/100 ml de producto.
Bebida de chufa
Agua, chufas* (12%), jarabe de agave, maltodextrina de maíz, almidón de tapioca y lecitina de girasol (E-322).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Or, Xata! light or Bebida de chufa?
Overall, Bebida de chufa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bebida de chufa has fewer calories: 46 kcal versus 56 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bebida de chufa has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 6.3 g per 100 g.