Olives aux Citron & touche de persil vs Olives vertes
Overall, Olives aux Citron & touche de persil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Olives aux Citron & touche d... | Olives vertes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 230 kcal | 143 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.6 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 3 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Olives vertes has 38% fewer calories (143 kcal vs 230 kcal).
- Olives vertes has 38% less fat (15 g vs 24 g).
- Olives aux Citron & touche de persil has 13% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 3 g).
- Olives vertes has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Olives aux Citron & touche de persil has 25% less salt (3 g vs 4 g).
- Olives aux Citron & touche de persil has the better Nutri-Score.
- Olives aux Citron & touche de persil is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Olives aux Citron & touche de persil
Olives vertes dénoyautées* 74,5 %, sel, acide lactique, huile de colza, zestes de citron jaune 5 %, persil 0,5 %.
Olives vertes
Olives vertes, eau, 10% pâte de poivron 6% , poivron, gélifiants: alginate de sodium-gomme guar, stabilisant: chlorure de calcium, sel, acidifiant: acide citrique; antioxydant: acide ascorbique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Olives aux Citron & touche de persil or Olives vertes?
Overall, Olives aux Citron & touche de persil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Olives vertes has fewer calories: 143 kcal versus 230 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Olives vertes has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.