Olive verdi bella di cerignola in salomoia vs Olives vertes La Ciotat
Overall, Olive verdi bella di cerignola in salomoia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Olive verdi bella di cerignola in salomoia
Olives vertes La Ciotat
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Olive verdi bella di cerigno... | Olives vertes La Ciotat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 141 kcal | 183 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 19.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 2.9 g |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Olive verdi bella di cerignola in salomoia has 23% fewer calories (141 kcal vs 183 kcal).
- Olive verdi bella di cerignola in salomoia has 27% less fat (14 g vs 19.1 g).
- Olives vertes La Ciotat has 36% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 2.5 g).
- Olive verdi bella di cerignola in salomoia has 28% less salt (2.1 g vs 2.9 g).
- Olives vertes La Ciotat has 14% more fiber (2.5 g vs 2.2 g).
Ingredients
Olive verdi bella di cerignola in salomoia
60% olives vertes (origine : Italie), eau, sel de cuisine, antioxydant: acide L-ascorbique. Peut contenir des traces de céleri, de moutarde et de anhydride sulfureux.
Olives vertes La Ciotat
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Olive verdi bella di cerignola in salomoia or Olives vertes La Ciotat?
Overall, Olive verdi bella di cerignola in salomoia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Olive verdi bella di cerignola in salomoia has fewer calories: 141 kcal versus 183 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Olive verdi bella di cerignola in salomoia has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.