Comparison

NUTROMA koffiemelk romig PET vs Lait Fairebel

Overall, Lait Fairebel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientNUTROMA koffiemelk romig PETLait Fairebel
Nutri-Score e b
NOVA group — 1
Calories 145 kcal 47 kcal
Fat 8.5 g 1.6 g
Saturated fat 5.5 g 1.1 g
Sugars 9.9 g 5 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 7.1 g 3.3 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lait Fairebel has 68% fewer calories (47 kcal vs 145 kcal).
  • Lait Fairebel has 81% less fat (1.6 g vs 8.5 g).
  • Lait Fairebel has 80% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 5.5 g).
  • Lait Fairebel has 49% less sugar (5 g vs 9.9 g).
  • Lait Fairebel has 86% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
  • NUTROMA koffiemelk romig PET has 54% more protein (7.1 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Lait Fairebel has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Lait Fairebel lists: Milk.

Ingredients

NUTROMA koffiemelk romig PET

Geëvaporeerde volle melk met 8% melkvet, 18% vetvrije melkdroge stof, stabilisator (E339)°

Lait Fairebel

Lait demi écrémé.

FAQ

Which is healthier: NUTROMA koffiemelk romig PET or Lait Fairebel?

Overall, Lait Fairebel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lait Fairebel has fewer calories: 47 kcal versus 145 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lait Fairebel has less sugar: 5 g versus 9.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons