NUTROMA koffiemelk romig PET vs Lait Fairebel
Overall, Lait Fairebel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | NUTROMA koffiemelk romig PET | Lait Fairebel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | b |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 145 kcal | 47 kcal |
| Fat | 8.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 9.9 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lait Fairebel has 68% fewer calories (47 kcal vs 145 kcal).
- Lait Fairebel has 81% less fat (1.6 g vs 8.5 g).
- Lait Fairebel has 80% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 5.5 g).
- Lait Fairebel has 49% less sugar (5 g vs 9.9 g).
- Lait Fairebel has 86% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- NUTROMA koffiemelk romig PET has 54% more protein (7.1 g vs 3.3 g).
- Lait Fairebel has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Lait Fairebel lists: Milk.
Ingredients
NUTROMA koffiemelk romig PET
Geëvaporeerde volle melk met 8% melkvet, 18% vetvrije melkdroge stof, stabilisator (E339)°
Lait Fairebel
Lait demi écrémé.
FAQ
Which is healthier: NUTROMA koffiemelk romig PET or Lait Fairebel?
Overall, Lait Fairebel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lait Fairebel has fewer calories: 47 kcal versus 145 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lait Fairebel has less sugar: 5 g versus 9.9 g per 100 g.