NUTROMA koffiemelk romig PET vs Not milk
Overall, Not milk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | NUTROMA koffiemelk romig PET | Not milk |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 145 kcal | 59 kcal |
| Fat | 8.5 g | 3.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 9.9 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Not milk has 59% fewer calories (59 kcal vs 145 kcal).
- Not milk has 59% less fat (3.5 g vs 8.5 g).
- Not milk has 93% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 5.5 g).
- Not milk has no sugar, while NUTROMA koffiemelk romig PET has 9.9 g.
- Not milk has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
- NUTROMA koffiemelk romig PET has 90% more protein (7.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Not milk has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Not milk lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
NUTROMA koffiemelk romig PET
Geëvaporeerde volle melk met 8% melkvet, 18% vetvrije melkdroge stof, stabilisator (E339)°
Not milk
HAFERBASIS(Wasser, HAFER (8,7%)), Sonnenblumenöl, Zichorienwurzelfasern, Erbsenprotein, Calciumcarbonat, Säureregulator (Kaliumphosphate), natürliche Aromen, Meersalz, Stabilisator (Gellan), Vitamine (B12, D2). Von Natur aus laktosefrei.
FAQ
Which is healthier: NUTROMA koffiemelk romig PET or Not milk?
Overall, Not milk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Not milk has fewer calories: 59 kcal versus 145 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Not milk has less sugar: 0 g versus 9.9 g per 100 g.