Norvegia, lettost 16% fett vs Lettost, 16% fett
Overall, Norvegia, lettost 16% fett has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Norvegia, lettost 16% fett | Lettost, 16% fett |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 268 kcal | 260 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 16 g |
| Saturated fat | 10 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 31 g | 29 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Norvegia, lettost 16% fett
Pasteurisert melk, syrekultur, salt, mikrobiell løpe, modningskultur.
Lettost, 16% fett
Pasteurisert melk, salt, vegetarisk løpe, konserveringsmiddel (E251), melkesyrekultur.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Norvegia, lettost 16% fett or Lettost, 16% fett?
Overall, Norvegia, lettost 16% fett has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lettost, 16% fett has fewer calories: 260 kcal versus 268 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Norvegia, lettost 16% fett has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.