Noix de cajous crues vs Cashewkerne, naturbelassen
Overall, Noix de cajous crues has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Noix de cajous crues | Cashewkerne, naturbelassen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 550 kcal | 603 kcal |
| Fat | 42.5 g | 47.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.5 g | 9.3 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 6.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 3.1 g |
| Protein | 17.5 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Noix de cajous crues has 19% less saturated fat (7.5 g vs 9.3 g).
- Noix de cajous crues has 19% less sugar (5 g vs 6.2 g).
- Cashewkerne, naturbelassen has 19% more fiber (3.1 g vs 2.5 g).
- Cashewkerne, naturbelassen has 17% more protein (21 g vs 17.5 g).
- Noix de cajous crues is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Noix de cajous crues
Cashew
Cashewkerne, naturbelassen
Cashewkerne. Kann Spuren von anderen Schalenfrüchten und Erdnüssen enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Noix de cajous crues or Cashewkerne, naturbelassen?
Overall, Noix de cajous crues has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Noix de cajous crues has fewer calories: 550 kcal versus 603 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Noix de cajous crues has less sugar: 5 g versus 6.2 g per 100 g.