Comparison

Nescafé Cappuccino vs Milo Pro

Overall, Milo Pro has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientNescafé CappuccinoMilo Pro
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 404 kcal 362 kcal
Fat 10 g 5.1 g
Saturated fat 10 g 2.5 g
Sugars 46.5 g 51.7 g
Salt 1.1 g 0.5 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 10.7 g 27.7 g
Additives42
AllergensMilkGluten, Milk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Milo Pro has 10% fewer calories (362 kcal vs 404 kcal).
  • Milo Pro has 49% less fat (5.1 g vs 10 g).
  • Milo Pro has 75% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 10 g).
  • Nescafé Cappuccino has 10% less sugar (46.5 g vs 51.7 g).
  • Milo Pro has 57% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Milo Pro has 61% more protein (27.7 g vs 10.7 g).
  • Only Milo Pro lists: Gluten, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Nescafé Cappuccino

Azúcar, leche descremada en polvo, jarabe de glucosa, café instantáneo (2,6%), aceite vegetal (palma), lactosa (leche), estabilizantes (hidrogenofosfato dipotásico, citrato trisódico, ácido cítrico), reguladores de acidez (hidrogenofosfato dipotásico, citrato trisódico y ácido cítrico), sequestrante (pirofosfato de sodio) y aromas naturales. CONTIENE LECHE.

Milo Pro

Leche, Extracto de Malta (Cebada), Concentrado de Proteína de Leche, Azúcar, Cacao, Vitaminas (Niacina, B6, B2, B12), Lecitina de Soya, Sales Minerales (Fosfato de Calcio), Emulsificante, Ferroso y Saborizante Natural. Contiene: Leche, Gluten, Soya.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Nescafé Cappuccino or Milo Pro?

Overall, Milo Pro has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Milo Pro has fewer calories: 362 kcal versus 404 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Nescafé Cappuccino has less sugar: 46.5 g versus 51.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons