Comparison

Nature vs Seedless Red Grapes

Overall, Seedless Red Grapes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientNatureSeedless Red Grapes
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group — 1
Calories 108 kcal 73 kcal
Fat 2.3 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0.5 g 15.5 g
Salt 1.8 g 0 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0.9 g
Protein 21 g 0.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Seedless Red Grapes has 32% fewer calories (73 kcal vs 108 kcal).
  • Seedless Red Grapes has 93% less fat (0.2 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Seedless Red Grapes has 96% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Nature has 97% less sugar (0.5 g vs 15.5 g).
  • Seedless Red Grapes has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Seedless Red Grapes has 44% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Nature has 97% more protein (21 g vs 0.7 g).

Ingredients

Nature

Not available.

Seedless Red Grapes

Red grapes

FAQ

Which is healthier: Nature or Seedless Red Grapes?

Overall, Seedless Red Grapes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Seedless Red Grapes has fewer calories: 73 kcal versus 108 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Nature has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 15.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons