Comparison
Nature vs Red Seedless Grapes
Overall, Red Seedless Grapes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nature | Red Seedless Grapes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 108 kcal | 66 kcal |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 15.4 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Red Seedless Grapes has 39% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 108 kcal).
- Red Seedless Grapes has 78% less fat (0.5 g vs 2.3 g).
- Red Seedless Grapes has no saturated fat, while Nature has 1.3 g.
- Nature has 97% less sugar (0.5 g vs 15.4 g).
- Red Seedless Grapes has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1.8 g).
- Red Seedless Grapes has 44% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0.5 g).
- Nature has 98% more protein (21 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Nature
Not available.
Red Seedless Grapes
Grapes
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nature or Red Seedless Grapes?
Overall, Red Seedless Grapes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Red Seedless Grapes has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 108 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nature has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 15.4 g per 100 g.