Natural Wheat Bran vs Salvado de trigo
Overall, Salvado de trigo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Natural Wheat Bran | Salvado de trigo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 206 kcal | 181 kcal |
| Fat | 5.5 g | 5.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 3.8 g | 4.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 36.4 g | 39 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Nuts, Sesame seeds, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salvado de trigo has 12% fewer calories (181 kcal vs 206 kcal).
- Natural Wheat Bran has 12% less sugar (3.8 g vs 4.3 g).
- Salvado de trigo has 13% more protein (15 g vs 13 g).
- Only Salvado de trigo lists: Nuts, Sesame seeds, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Natural Wheat Bran
Wheat bran
Salvado de trigo
Salvado de trigo grueso. Contiene gluten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Natural Wheat Bran or Salvado de trigo?
Overall, Salvado de trigo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salvado de trigo has fewer calories: 181 kcal versus 206 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Natural Wheat Bran has less sugar: 3.8 g versus 4.3 g per 100 g.