Comparison
Muslo de pato vs Mini camperos
Overall, Muslo de pato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Muslo de pato | Mini camperos |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 278 kcal | 379 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 6 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 29 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Muslo de pato has 27% fewer calories (278 kcal vs 379 kcal).
- Mini camperos has 89% less fat (2 g vs 18 g).
- Mini camperos has 93% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 6 g).
- Muslo de pato has 74% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.9 g).
- Muslo de pato has 31% less salt (1.4 g vs 2 g).
- Muslo de pato has 59% more protein (29 g vs 12 g).
Ingredients
Muslo de pato
1 muslo de pato (85%), grasa de pato, sal y conservador: E-250.
Mini camperos
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Muslo de pato or Mini camperos?
Overall, Muslo de pato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Muslo de pato has fewer calories: 278 kcal versus 379 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Muslo de pato has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.