Comparison

Mouse de Foie de Pato vs Melva en Aceite de Girasol

Overall, Melva en Aceite de Girasol has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMouse de Foie de PatoMelva en Aceite de Girasol
Nutri-Score e b
NOVA group — —
Calories 424 kcal 200 kcal
Fat 42.8 g 14 g
Saturated fat 17.1 g 1.2 g
Sugars 1.2 g 0 g
Salt 1.6 g 1.2 g
Protein 8 g 23.4 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Melva en Aceite de Girasol has 53% fewer calories (200 kcal vs 424 kcal).
  • Melva en Aceite de Girasol has 67% less fat (14 g vs 42.8 g).
  • Melva en Aceite de Girasol has 93% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 17.1 g).
  • Melva en Aceite de Girasol has no sugar, while Mouse de Foie de Pato has 1.2 g.
  • Melva en Aceite de Girasol has 23% less salt (1.2 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Melva en Aceite de Girasol has 66% more protein (23.4 g vs 8 g).
  • Melva en Aceite de Girasol has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Mouse de Foie de Pato

Not available.

Melva en Aceite de Girasol

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mouse de Foie de Pato or Melva en Aceite de Girasol?

Overall, Melva en Aceite de Girasol has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Melva en Aceite de Girasol has fewer calories: 200 kcal versus 424 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Melva en Aceite de Girasol has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons