Comparison

Moule décoquillée cuite ASC vs Miesmuscheln

Overall, Moule décoquillée cuite ASC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Better choice

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Moule décoquillée cuite ASC	Miesmuscheln
Nutri-Score	a	a
NOVA group	1	1
Calories	104 kcal	97 kcal
Fat	2.6 g	2.7 g
Saturated fat	0.6 g	1.8 g
Sugars	0.9 g	0.5 g
Salt	0.7 g	1 g
Fiber	0 g	0 g
Protein	16 g	15 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	Molluscs	Molluscs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Moule décoquillée cuite ASC has 67% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1.8 g).
Miesmuscheln has 44% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
Moule décoquillée cuite ASC has 35% less salt (0.7 g vs 1 g).

Ingredients

Moule décoquillée cuite ASC

Moule du Pacifique (Mytilus chilensis) élevée au Chili.

Miesmuscheln

FAQ

Which is healthier: Moule décoquillée cuite ASC or Miesmuscheln?

Overall, Moule décoquillée cuite ASC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Miesmuscheln has fewer calories: 97 kcal versus 104 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Miesmuscheln has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Moules du Pacifique déco... vs Miesmuscheln Moule décoquillée cuite... vs Moules du pacifique apér... Moules du pacifique apér... vs Miesmuscheln Moule décoquillée cuite... vs Moules du pacifique Moule décoquillée cuite... vs Moules du Pacifique déco... Moules du pacifique vs Miesmuscheln Moule décoquillée cuite... vs Moules du pacifique Moules du pacifique vs Miesmuscheln