Comparison

Moules du pacifique vs Miesmuscheln

Overall, Miesmuscheln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMoules du pacifiqueMiesmuscheln
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group — 1
Calories 323 kcal 97 kcal
Fat 29 g 2.7 g
Saturated fat 18 g 1.8 g
Sugars 0.2 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.1 g 1 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 8.6 g 15 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedMolluscs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Miesmuscheln has 70% fewer calories (97 kcal vs 323 kcal).
  • Miesmuscheln has 91% less fat (2.7 g vs 29 g).
  • Miesmuscheln has 90% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 18 g).
  • Moules du pacifique has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Miesmuscheln has 43% more protein (15 g vs 8.6 g).
  • Miesmuscheln has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Miesmuscheln lists: Molluscs.

Ingredients

Moules du pacifique

Not available.

Miesmuscheln

Miesmuscheln

FAQ

Which is healthier: Moules du pacifique or Miesmuscheln?

Overall, Miesmuscheln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Miesmuscheln has fewer calories: 97 kcal versus 323 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Moules du pacifique has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons