Moules du pacifique vs Miesmuscheln
Overall, Miesmuscheln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Moules du pacifique | Miesmuscheln |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 323 kcal | 97 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 1.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 8.6 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Miesmuscheln has 70% fewer calories (97 kcal vs 323 kcal).
- Miesmuscheln has 91% less fat (2.7 g vs 29 g).
- Miesmuscheln has 90% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 18 g).
- Moules du pacifique has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Miesmuscheln has 43% more protein (15 g vs 8.6 g).
- Miesmuscheln has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Miesmuscheln lists: Molluscs.
Ingredients
Moules du pacifique
Not available.
Miesmuscheln
Miesmuscheln
FAQ
Which is healthier: Moules du pacifique or Miesmuscheln?
Overall, Miesmuscheln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Miesmuscheln has fewer calories: 97 kcal versus 323 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Moules du pacifique has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.