Moules du pacifique apéritif vs Miesmuscheln
Overall, Moules du pacifique apéritif has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Moules du pacifique apéritif | Miesmuscheln |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 87 kcal | 97 kcal |
| Fat | 2.1 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 1.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Molluscs | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Moules du pacifique apéritif has 10% fewer calories (87 kcal vs 97 kcal).
- Moules du pacifique apéritif has 22% less fat (2.1 g vs 2.7 g).
- Moules du pacifique apéritif has 67% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1.8 g).
- Miesmuscheln has 13% more protein (15 g vs 13 g).
Ingredients
Moules du pacifique apéritif
moules
Miesmuscheln
Miesmuscheln
FAQ
Which is healthier: Moules du pacifique apéritif or Miesmuscheln?
Overall, Moules du pacifique apéritif has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Moules du pacifique apéritif has fewer calories: 87 kcal versus 97 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Miesmuscheln has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.