Moules du pacifique vs Miesmuscheln
Overall, Miesmuscheln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Moules du pacifique | Miesmuscheln |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 198 kcal | 97 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 1.8 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Miesmuscheln has 51% fewer calories (97 kcal vs 198 kcal).
- Miesmuscheln has 79% less fat (2.7 g vs 13 g).
- Moules du pacifique has 28% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 1.8 g).
- Miesmuscheln has 84% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.1 g).
- Miesmuscheln has 29% less salt (1 g vs 1.4 g).
- Miesmuscheln has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Miesmuscheln lists: Molluscs.
Ingredients
Moules du pacifique
Not available.
Miesmuscheln
Miesmuscheln
FAQ
Which is healthier: Moules du pacifique or Miesmuscheln?
Overall, Miesmuscheln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Miesmuscheln has fewer calories: 97 kcal versus 198 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Miesmuscheln has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.