Moule décoquillée cuite ASC vs Barlomar mejillones cocidos en su jugo
Overall, Moule décoquillée cuite ASC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Moule décoquillée cuite ASC
Barlomar mejillones cocidos en su jugo
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Moule décoquillée cuite ASC | Barlomar mejillones cocidos... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 104 kcal | 83 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 16 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Molluscs | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Barlomar mejillones cocidos en su jugo has 20% fewer calories (83 kcal vs 104 kcal).
- Barlomar mejillones cocidos en su jugo has 23% less fat (2 g vs 2.6 g).
- Barlomar mejillones cocidos en su jugo has no sugar, while Moule décoquillée cuite ASC has 0.9 g.
- Moule décoquillée cuite ASC has 62% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.7 g).
- Moule décoquillée cuite ASC has 19% more protein (16 g vs 13 g).
- Moule décoquillée cuite ASC has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Moule décoquillée cuite ASC
Moule du Pacifique (Mytilus chilensis) élevée au Chili.
Barlomar mejillones cocidos en su jugo
mejillón mediterráneo (Mytilus galloprovincialis)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Moule décoquillée cuite ASC or Barlomar mejillones cocidos en su jugo?
Overall, Moule décoquillée cuite ASC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Barlomar mejillones cocidos en su jugo has fewer calories: 83 kcal versus 104 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Barlomar mejillones cocidos en su jugo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.