Comparison

M&M’s Crispy vs Lindor Lait

Overall, M&M’s Crispy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientM&M’s CrispyLindor Lait
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 484 kcal 623 kcal
Fat 21 g 47 g
Saturated fat 14 g 34 g
Sugars 57 g 42 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0.3 g —
Protein 4.3 g 5 g
Additives112
AllergensGluten, Milk, SoybeansGluten, Milk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • M&M’s Crispy has 22% fewer calories (484 kcal vs 623 kcal).
  • M&M’s Crispy has 55% less fat (21 g vs 47 g).
  • M&M’s Crispy has 59% less saturated fat (14 g vs 34 g).
  • Lindor Lait has 26% less sugar (42 g vs 57 g).
  • Lindor Lait has 14% more protein (5 g vs 4.3 g).

Ingredients

M&M’s Crispy

Sucre, pâte de cacao, farine de riz (9,2%), lait écrémé en poudre, beurre de cacao, matière grasse de palmiste, matière grasse de palme, amidon, perméat de lactosérum (lait), matière grasse du lait, sirop de glucose, matière grasse de karité, extrait de malt d'orge, stabilisant (gomme arabique), sel, dextrine, émulsifiant (lécithine de soja), dextrose, agents d'enrobage (cire de carnauba), colorants (e100, e120, e133, e160a, e160e, e170), arômes, huile de palme.

Lindor Lait

Sucre, matière grasse végétale (coprah, palmiste), beurre de cacao, pâte de cacao, poudre de _lait_, poudre de _lait_ écrémé, _lactose_, beurre _laitier_ concentré, émulsifiant (lécithine de _soja_), extrait de malt d'_orge_, arômes,

FAQ

Which is healthier: M&M’s Crispy or Lindor Lait?

Overall, M&M’s Crispy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

M&M’s Crispy has fewer calories: 484 kcal versus 623 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lindor Lait has less sugar: 42 g versus 57 g per 100 g.

More comparisons