M&M\'s vs Pintarolas
Overall, M&M\'s has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | M&M\'s | Pintarolas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 524 kcal | 502 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 53 g | 64 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 9.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 11 | 10 |
| Allergens | Milk, Peanuts, Soybeans | Milk, Nuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pintarolas has 19% less fat (21 g vs 26 g).
- M&M\'s has 17% less sugar (53 g vs 64 g).
- M&M\'s has 53% more fiber (2.1 g vs 1 g).
- M&M\'s has 95% more protein (9.8 g vs 0.5 g).
- Only M&M\'s lists: Peanuts.
- Only Pintarolas lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
M&M\'s
sucre, _cacahuètes_, pâte de cacao, _lait_ entier en poudre, beurre de cacao, amidon, matière grasse de palme, sirop de glucose, _lait_ écrémé en poudre, émulsifiant (lécithine de _soja_), _lactose_, stabilisant (gomme arabique), matière grasse de karité, matière grasse du _lait_, dextrine, agent d'enrobage (cire de carnauba), colorants (E100, E120, E133, E160a, E160e, E170), huile de palme, arômes, sel.
Pintarolas
milk chocolate (67%) (sugar, cocoa butter, cocoa mass, milk powder, whey powder, concentrated butter , almonds and hazelnuts paste, emulsifier ( soya lecithin)), sugar, corn starch, colours (e171, e162, e150c, e160a, e163, e100), glazing agents (e414, e903), flavouring,
FAQ
Which is healthier: M&M\'s or Pintarolas?
Overall, M&M\'s has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pintarolas has fewer calories: 502 kcal versus 524 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
M&M\'s has less sugar: 53 g versus 64 g per 100 g.