Comparison

Mix voor gehakt traditioneel vs Boemboe babi ketjap

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMix voor gehakt traditioneelBoemboe babi ketjap
Nutri-Score — e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 92 kcal 193 kcal
Fat 3.5 g 1.9 g
Saturated fat 1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0.2 g 40 g
Salt 73.2 g 3.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0.7 g
Protein 2.6 g 1.1 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mix voor gehakt traditioneel has 52% fewer calories (92 kcal vs 193 kcal).
  • Boemboe babi ketjap has 46% less fat (1.9 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Boemboe babi ketjap has 90% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1 g).
  • Mix voor gehakt traditioneel has 99% less sugar (0.2 g vs 40 g).
  • Boemboe babi ketjap has 96% less salt (3.1 g vs 73.2 g).
  • Boemboe babi ketjap has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Mix voor gehakt traditioneel has 58% more protein (2.6 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Mix voor gehakt traditioneel is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Boemboe babi ketjap lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Mix voor gehakt traditioneel

Zout, 25% specerijen (koriander, peper, gember, foelie, nootmuskaat, kardemom, chilies), majoraan.

Boemboe babi ketjap

Ketjap 70% (melado, sojabonensap, suiker, zout, kruiden en specerijen (sereh, laos, salam, koriander)), water, uienpoeder, raapzaadolie, knoflookpoeder, koriander, witte peper, natuurazijn, verdikkingsmiddel (xanthaangom).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mix voor gehakt traditioneel or Boemboe babi ketjap?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mix voor gehakt traditioneel has fewer calories: 92 kcal versus 193 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mix voor gehakt traditioneel has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 40 g per 100 g.

More comparisons