Mirabelle cuite au chaudron vs Prunes du Lot et Garonne
Overall, Mirabelle cuite au chaudron has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Mirabelle cuite au chaudron
Prunes du Lot et Garonne
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mirabelle cuite au chaudron | Prunes du Lot et Garonne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 177 kcal | 244 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 43 g | 57 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mirabelle cuite au chaudron has 27% fewer calories (177 kcal vs 244 kcal).
- Mirabelle cuite au chaudron has 72% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.8 g).
- Mirabelle cuite au chaudron has 25% less sugar (43 g vs 57 g).
- Prunes du Lot et Garonne has 90% more protein (5 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Mirabelle cuite au chaudron
Mirabelles 50%, sucre, pommes 13%, jus de citron concentré, gélifiant : pectines.
Prunes du Lot et Garonne
Prunes du Lot et Garonne, sucre de canne, gélifiant: pectines, jus de citron concentré
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mirabelle cuite au chaudron or Prunes du Lot et Garonne?
Overall, Mirabelle cuite au chaudron has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mirabelle cuite au chaudron has fewer calories: 177 kcal versus 244 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mirabelle cuite au chaudron has less sugar: 43 g versus 57 g per 100 g.