Comparison
Mini Makrout vs Makrout
Overall, Makrout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mini Makrout | Makrout |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 481 kcal | 432 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.1 g | 2.5 g |
| Sugars | 22 g | 20 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 6 g | 4.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Makrout has 10% fewer calories (432 kcal vs 481 kcal).
- Makrout has 28% less fat (18 g vs 25 g).
- Makrout has 19% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 3.1 g).
- Mini Makrout has 18% more protein (6 g vs 4.9 g).
Ingredients
Mini Makrout
Not available.
Makrout
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mini Makrout or Makrout?
Overall, Makrout has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Makrout has fewer calories: 432 kcal versus 481 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Makrout has less sugar: 20 g versus 22 g per 100 g.