Miel de caña vs Gember siroop
Overall, Gember siroop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Miel de caña | Gember siroop |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 2 | 3 |
| Calories | 290 kcal | 235 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 75 g | 57.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gember siroop has 19% fewer calories (235 kcal vs 290 kcal).
- Gember siroop has 23% less sugar (57.6 g vs 75 g).
- Miel de caña is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Miel de caña
Jugo de la caña de azúcar, acidulante (ácido cítrico).
Gember siroop
Suiker, water, gember, geleer - middel E440, voedingszuur E330, conserveermiddel E202
FAQ
Which is healthier: Miel de caña or Gember siroop?
Overall, Gember siroop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gember siroop has fewer calories: 235 kcal versus 290 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gember siroop has less sugar: 57.6 g versus 75 g per 100 g.