Melasse de sucre de canne vs Miel de caña
Overall, Miel de caña has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Melasse de sucre de canne | Miel de caña |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 2 |
| Calories | 294 kcal | 290 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 62 g | 75 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | — |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Miel de caña has no fat, while Melasse de sucre de canne has 0.5 g.
- Miel de caña has no saturated fat, while Melasse de sucre de canne has 0.5 g.
- Melasse de sucre de canne has 17% less sugar (62 g vs 75 g).
- Melasse de sucre de canne has 100% more protein (2.7 g vs 0 g).
- Miel de caña is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Melasse de sucre de canne lists: None.
Ingredients
Melasse de sucre de canne
Mélasse
Miel de caña
Jugo de la caña de azúcar, acidulante (ácido cítrico).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Melasse de sucre de canne or Miel de caña?
Overall, Miel de caña has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Miel de caña has fewer calories: 290 kcal versus 294 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Melasse de sucre de canne has less sugar: 62 g versus 75 g per 100 g.