Comparison

Mehlwürmer vs Microdélices Apéro

Overall, Mehlwürmer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMehlwürmerMicrodélices Apéro
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 508 kcal 488 kcal
Fat 26 g 27.8 g
Saturated fat 6.4 g 7.6 g
Sugars 2.7 g 0.8 g
Salt 3.2 g 3.9 g
Fiber 15 g 6.3 g
Protein 41 g 54 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, Ganze getrocknete mehlwürmerNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mehlwürmer has 16% less saturated fat (6.4 g vs 7.6 g).
  • Microdélices Apéro has 70% less sugar (0.8 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Mehlwürmer has 18% less salt (3.2 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Mehlwürmer has 58% more fiber (15 g vs 6.3 g).
  • Microdélices Apéro has 24% more protein (54 g vs 41 g).
  • Only Mehlwürmer lists: Gluten, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, Ganze getrocknete mehlwürmer.

Ingredients

Mehlwürmer

Ganze getrocknete Mehlwürmer (Tenebrio molitor), Gewürzzubereitung [Salz, Knoblauch 20% (Sulfite), Zucker, Gewürzpflanzen 18% (davon Thymian, Kerbel, Petersilie), Pfeffer, Gewürze, Gewürzextrakte] Stabilisator (Akaziengummi).

Microdélices Apéro

. ténébrions" entiers déshydratés (Tenebrio molitor), grillons" entiers déshydratés (Gryllodes sigillatus), arôme* (7,2 %) (sel de mer, farine de riz', légumes (11,5%) (carottes*, oignons', celeri huile de tournesol*, épices* (curcuma*, persil')), huile de sel,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mehlwürmer or Microdélices Apéro?

Overall, Mehlwürmer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Microdélices Apéro has fewer calories: 488 kcal versus 508 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Microdélices Apéro has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons