Comparison

Maple Turkey Bacon vs Smoked Turkey Rashers

Overall, Smoked Turkey Rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMaple Turkey BaconSmoked Turkey Rashers
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 179 kcal 111 kcal
Fat 7.1 g 2.4 g
Saturated fat 1.8 g 0.7 g
Sugars 3.6 g 1.2 g
Salt 2 g 2 g
Protein 21.4 g 20.5 g
Additives50
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Smoked Turkey Rashers has 38% fewer calories (111 kcal vs 179 kcal).
  • Smoked Turkey Rashers has 66% less fat (2.4 g vs 7.1 g).
  • Smoked Turkey Rashers has 61% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Smoked Turkey Rashers has 66% less sugar (1.2 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Smoked Turkey Rashers has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Maple Turkey Bacon

Turkey thigh, turkey, water, sugar, potassium lactate, salt, natural maple flavor, sugar, natural flavors, maple syrup, sodium phosphate, sodium diacetate, sodium erythorbate, sodium nitrite

Smoked Turkey Rashers

Ballyfree SMOKED 6 TURKEY RASHERS OUR TASTY TURKEY RASHERS ARE LOW IN FAT AND PACKED FULL OF FLAVOUR Per Rasher (25g) raw as sold contains: 27 CALORIES PER RASHER HIGH IN PROTEIN Serving suggestion Keep refrigerated below 5°c 8V358 ENERGY FAT SATURATES SUGARS SALT 116 27heal 0.6 0.2 <વી હ 0.5g Use by: 1% 1% <1% L3 06:19 150g e Reference intake of an adult (8400kJ/

FAQ

Which is healthier: Maple Turkey Bacon or Smoked Turkey Rashers?

Overall, Smoked Turkey Rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Smoked Turkey Rashers has fewer calories: 111 kcal versus 179 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Smoked Turkey Rashers has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons