Maple Turkey Bacon vs Bacon de dinde
Overall, Maple Turkey Bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Maple Turkey Bacon | Bacon de dinde |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 179 kcal | 204 kcal |
| Fat | 7.1 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 4.7 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 2.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 5 | 7 |
| Allergens | None listed | Celery, Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Maple Turkey Bacon has 12% fewer calories (179 kcal vs 204 kcal).
- Maple Turkey Bacon has 52% less fat (7.1 g vs 15 g).
- Maple Turkey Bacon has 62% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 4.7 g).
- Bacon de dinde has 72% less sugar (1 g vs 3.6 g).
- Maple Turkey Bacon has 25% more protein (21.4 g vs 16 g).
- Only Bacon de dinde lists: Celery, Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Maple Turkey Bacon
Turkey thigh, turkey, water, sugar, potassium lactate, salt, natural maple flavor, sugar, natural flavors, maple syrup, sodium phosphate, sodium diacetate, sodium erythorbate, sodium nitrite
Bacon de dinde
Viande de dinde 92%, sel, huile végétale (colza, tournesol, palme), sirop de glucose, dextrose, protéine végétale (SOJA, maïs), herbes (thym, marjolaine), épices (CELERI, poivre), oignon, protéine de LAIT, arôme (poivre), stabilisant E407, E450, E451, E452, antioxydant E301, E392, conservateur E250.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Maple Turkey Bacon or Bacon de dinde?
Overall, Maple Turkey Bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Maple Turkey Bacon has fewer calories: 179 kcal versus 204 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bacon de dinde has less sugar: 1 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.