Mango Lassi auf Kokosnussbasis vs Haferdrink natur
Overall, Haferdrink natur has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Mango Lassi auf Kokosnussbas... | Haferdrink natur |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 66 kcal | 48 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 9.2 g | 5.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Haferdrink natur has 27% fewer calories (48 kcal vs 66 kcal).
- Haferdrink natur has 85% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1.3 g).
- Haferdrink natur has 39% less sugar (5.6 g vs 9.2 g).
- Haferdrink natur has 69% more fiber (1.6 g vs 0.5 g).
- Mango Lassi auf Kokosnussbasis has 50% more protein (0.8 g vs 0.4 g).
- Haferdrink natur has the better Nutri-Score.
- Haferdrink natur is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Haferdrink natur lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Mango Lassi auf Kokosnussbasis
Kokosnussdrink (Trinkwasser, teilentöltes Kokosfruchtfleisch* 8), 11% Mangopüree*, Rübenzucker*, Maisstärke*, Kokosöl*, Maracujasaft aus Maracujasaftkonzentrat*, Stabilisator: Pektin; Verdickungsmittel: Guarkernmehl*; Meersalz, Joghurtkulturen. *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft
Haferdrink natur
Wasser, Hafer 15%, Sonnenblumenöl, Meersalz
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mango Lassi auf Kokosnussbasis or Haferdrink natur?
Overall, Haferdrink natur has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Haferdrink natur has fewer calories: 48 kcal versus 66 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Haferdrink natur has less sugar: 5.6 g versus 9.2 g per 100 g.