Reiskokosdrink Bio vs Haferdrink natur
Overall, Haferdrink natur has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Reiskokosdrink Bio | Haferdrink natur |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 52 kcal | 48 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 5.7 g | 5.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Haferdrink natur has 80% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1 g).
- Only Haferdrink natur lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Reiskokosdrink Bio
Wasser, Reis (1470), Kokosmilch (6%) (Kokosnussextrakt, Wasser), Meersalz, natürliches Kokosnussaroma
Haferdrink natur
Wasser, Hafer 15%, Sonnenblumenöl, Meersalz
FAQ
Which is healthier: Reiskokosdrink Bio or Haferdrink natur?
Overall, Haferdrink natur has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Haferdrink natur has fewer calories: 48 kcal versus 52 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Haferdrink natur has less sugar: 5.6 g versus 5.7 g per 100 g.