Comparison

Reiskokosdrink Bio vs Direktsaft Orange ohne Fruchtfleisch

Overall, Direktsaft Orange ohne Fruchtfleisch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientReiskokosdrink BioDirektsaft Orange ohne Fruch...
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 52 kcal 35 kcal
Fat 1.1 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 5.7 g 7.8 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.7 g
Fiber — 1.3 g
Protein 0.5 g 0.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Direktsaft Orange ohne Fruchtfleisch has 33% fewer calories (35 kcal vs 52 kcal).
  • Direktsaft Orange ohne Fruchtfleisch has 55% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Direktsaft Orange ohne Fruchtfleisch has 90% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1 g).
  • Reiskokosdrink Bio has 27% less sugar (5.7 g vs 7.8 g).
  • Reiskokosdrink Bio has 80% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Direktsaft Orange ohne Fruchtfleisch has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Direktsaft Orange ohne Fruchtfleisch is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Reiskokosdrink Bio

Wasser, Reis (1470), Kokosmilch (6%) (Kokosnussextrakt, Wasser), Meersalz, natürliches Kokosnussaroma

Direktsaft Orange ohne Fruchtfleisch

Orangensaft (100 %).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Reiskokosdrink Bio or Direktsaft Orange ohne Fruchtfleisch?

Overall, Direktsaft Orange ohne Fruchtfleisch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Direktsaft Orange ohne Fruchtfleisch has fewer calories: 35 kcal versus 52 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Reiskokosdrink Bio has less sugar: 5.7 g versus 7.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons