Makrelfilet I Tomatsauce vs Finhakket makrellfilet i tomatsaus
Overall, Makrelfilet I Tomatsauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Makrelfilet I Tomatsauce
Finhakket makrellfilet i tomatsaus
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Makrelfilet I Tomatsauce | Finhakket makrellfilet i tom... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 126 kcal | 182 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 7.2 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 2.3 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Makrelfilet I Tomatsauce has 31% fewer calories (126 kcal vs 182 kcal).
- Makrelfilet I Tomatsauce has 17% less fat (10 g vs 12 g).
- Makrelfilet I Tomatsauce has 74% less sugar (1.9 g vs 7.2 g).
- Makrelfilet I Tomatsauce has 37% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.3 g).
- Makrelfilet I Tomatsauce has 29% more protein (14 g vs 10 g).
- Makrelfilet I Tomatsauce has the better Nutri-Score.
- Makrelfilet I Tomatsauce is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Makrelfilet I Tomatsauce
64% mackerel fillet (Scomber scombrus) without skin and bones, 23% water, 12% tomato paste, salt.
Finhakket makrellfilet i tomatsaus
Makrell 50%, tomatsaus 50 %, (tomatpurè, vann, sukker, salt, antioksidant (askorbinsyre og sitronsyre), fortykningsmiddel (gellangummi).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Makrelfilet I Tomatsauce or Finhakket makrellfilet i tomatsaus?
Overall, Makrelfilet I Tomatsauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Makrelfilet I Tomatsauce has fewer calories: 126 kcal versus 182 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Makrelfilet I Tomatsauce has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 7.2 g per 100 g.